William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu> wrote: > With the document side of XML where a DTD model is insufficient, isn't > the tradition to require DTD validation _and_ a noiseless run through > some other form of validating processor? > > I think that makes sense for XHTML. That is, "valid" might, for example, > mean both DTD valid and relax-ng valid. I imagine it would be annoying to have your document be validated against a DTD if you used elements and attributes from other namespaces which the DTD (necessarily) did not cover. DTDs are not just insufficient; they are too sloppy and too strict at the same time. -- Daniel Brockman daniel@brockman.nuReceived on Monday, 4 August 2003 10:48:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:32 GMT