Re: XHTML 2.0 Last Call process

>
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 06:11:39 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I like to suggest that XHTML 2.0 is not advanced to Candidate
> > Recommendation status after Last Call but rather that the HTML WG issues
> > a second Last Call after reviewer comments have been addressed.
>
> Last means last.  Kind of silly otherwise.
>

Of course "last" tautologically means "last."  However, "Last Call" does not
necessarily mean "last."  On the contrary, blindly organizing things by the
literal meaning of a name would be silly.  Issuing two Last Calls would make
the name misleading, at worst.

--
Daniel Brockman
daniel@brockman.nu