* J. King wrote: >On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 06:11:39 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> >wrote: > >> I like to suggest that XHTML 2.0 is not advanced to Candidate >> Recommendation status after Last Call but rather that the HTML WG issues >> a second Last Call after reviewer comments have been addressed. > >Last means last. http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#return-to-wgReceived on Sunday, 3 August 2003 03:45:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:32 GMT