W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2003

Re: l element (was: more xhtml 2.0 comments)

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:32:29 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200304160632.h3G6WTL07879@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

> If I am correct in thinking that the <l>...</l> element has the same
> behavior as <div>...</div>, why not remove BOTH from the specification and

That's a presentational argument.  XHTML2 features have to be justified
on primarily structural grounds.

> use <container>...</container> (or some other appropriate word/abbreviation)

I believe the intention is that <l> should not contain any block level
elements, whereas <div> normally only contains block level elements.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 02:32:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:03 UTC