W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2003

Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments

From: (wrong string) äper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:05:38 +0200
Message-ID: <002401c30360$7a6551b0$3ef4ae8b@heim4.tuclausthal.de>
To: <www-html@w3.org>


fantasai:
>
> I dispute that. In some contexts, a line is semantic. Not so in prose
> paragraphs, perhaps, but certainly in poetry.

Another valid example is probably the Bible.

Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 11:05:37 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Glazman: "l element (was: more xhtml 2.0 comments)"
Previous message: Daniel Glazman: "Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments"
In reply to: fantasai: "Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments"
Next in thread: David Woolley: "Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:20 GMT