On Saturday, May 18, 2002, 4:42:06 PM, William F. Hammond wrote: > > That would explain why IE attempts to render > > http://tom.me.uk/2002/3/test.zip as XML instead of downloading, how > > incredibly idiotic. > > Isn't that served through http as "application/x-zip-compressed"? Hmm, well it was giving the type as that. The server is now giving application/zip and IE doesn't have a problem with it. I do have x-zip-compressed registered on my system as a zip file, but it is still very silly that MSXML takes over if it detects <?xml... in the file. -- Tom Gilder tom@tom.me.ukReceived on Saturday, 18 May 2002 12:33:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:16 GMT