- From: Erich Reto Iseli <Erich.Iseli@iseli.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 14:47:50 +0100
- To: W3C HTML Specification Discussion <www-html@w3.org>
Peter Sheerin wrote: > Erich Reto Iseli wrote: > > Methinks... if you are not ready to use XHTML1.1, then stick with > > XHTML1.0 Strict. And if you are not ready to use XHTML1.0 strict, > > use XHTML1.0 Transitional. But please *please*! Don't abuse > > modularization! > > Since the target and frame modules are defined by the w3 XHTML > modularization documents, OK, I was not aware of that. I always used only the XHTML 1.1 documents and there was no reference to the frames and target modules. Now I found it at http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410/abstract_modules.html#s_framesmodule > exactly how is actually using them, and fixing a > serious error in the 1.1 DTD abusing the concept? So if there's a _serious error_ in the 1.1 DTD, why doesn't it get fixed? Is it so hard to write an errata page? I got confused by this and I'm sure I'm not the first, nor the last one... Erich
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 08:47:52 UTC