W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?

From: William F. Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
Date: 07 Jan 2002 23:27:44 -0500
To: ITO Tsuyoshi <tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <i7d70lpiv3.fsf@pluto.math.albany.edu>

ITO Tsuyoshi <tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:

>  . . .                                        But I cannot find this
> restriction in normative part.

This requirement is derived from the XML specification inasmuch as
XHTML is an XML application.  See  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml .

                                    -- Bill

Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 23:27:51 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ITO Tsuyoshi: "Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?"
Previous message: ITO Tsuyoshi: "Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?"
In reply to: ITO Tsuyoshi: "Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?"
Next in thread: ITO Tsuyoshi: "Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?"
Reply: ITO Tsuyoshi: "Re: Is XHTML 1.0 2nd ed. Section 4.3 really informative?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:27 GMT