> Also, if <br /> in HTML was equivalent to <br>>, then that would seem to > indicate that every web browser out there is broken, and should display this > as a line break followed by the greater than symbol. That's correct. Most of the existing web browsers do not have HTML parsers. They have tag soup parsers that make at best a token attempt to parse HTML correctly (containment, NET, comments, the list of things that are parsed incorrectly goes on and on). > I don't know what > logic you are using to determine that <br /> = <br>>, but it seems flawed > to me. "<br /" by itself is equivalent to "<br>" in HTML because the DTD enables the SGML shorthand feature for this. Please do read the existing (extensive) archived discussion of this and related issues. Boris -- We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough. -- Niels BohrReceived on Monday, 30 December 2002 16:01:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:18 GMT