Can you tell me where you found this information? I have never seen anything like this stated anywhere within the W3 documents. -----Original Message----- From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:52 PM To: Peter Foti (PeterF) Subject: Re: Promotion of XHTML > WHAT?!! You are now saying that there is no such thing as an > HTML-compatible XHTML 1.0 document? Am I reading that right? > > So are you saying that <br /> is not HTML-compatible? It's an empty > element, as it *could* be represented in XML, yet is also HTML-compatible. <br /> in XML is equivalent to <br></br> <br /> in HTML is equivalent to <br>>, which is equivalent to the XML markup <br></br>> I cannot see how those two could be called compatible... Boris -- In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a sentence with words in the proper order then why can't he?Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 14:10:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:21 GMT