FW: Promotion of XHTML

> > the use of 'text/html' SHOULD be limited to HTML-compatible 
> > XHTML 1.0 documents
> 
> Which don't exist due to basic issues like the conflict between 
> NET and the
> empty-element notation in XML....


WHAT?!!  You are now saying that there is no such thing as an 
HTML-compatible XHTML 1.0 document?  Am I reading that right?

So are you saying that <br /> is not HTML-compatible?  It's an 
empty element, as it *could* be represented in XML, yet is also 
HTML-compatible.

-Pete