W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2002

RE: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>?

From: Richard Norman <normri@samc.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:37:59 -0800
Message-Id: <se0c2d8d.051@samc.com>
To: <www-html@w3.org>

While I agree, I would use <cell> instead of <td>  it is just a little
bit more readable without too much overhead. <tr> maybe changed to <row>
and maybe create a <col> tag for just a column of data.  but row would
suffice for that requirement.  Anyway, I would say that shortening tags
were feasible is a good thing as long as clarity is still maintained. 
Going from <line> to <l>  is a little stretch in the clarity department,
but <ln> for line is a little better.
 
Just my opinion...
 
Sincerely,
 
Richard K. Norman II
Web/Application Developer
Saint Agnes Medical Center
 
Email: Richard.Norman@samc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonny Axelsson <jax@opera.no> 
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:10 AM
To: <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>?




On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:53:35 EST, <SCJessey@aol.com> wrote: 

> I finally got a chance to look over the latest Working Draft for XHTML

> 2.0 and I was disappointed to see that the <line> element has been 
> altered to read <l> instead. 
> 
> Does anyone else think this is a bad idea?  On some text editors, it 
> looks an awful lot like the old HTML italic tag which will doubtless 
> cause confusion. 

There is a SVG element called line (for a line segment, not a line of 
verse). This will cause no problem for a namespace aware user agent
(since 
the namespaces are different), but may make the code harder to read or 
refer to. 

More importantly, size matters. I wouldn't expect the 'l' element to be 
used in most pages, but where it is used, it will be used a lot. Having
a 
'table' or 'caption' element is a good idea, but replacing 'td' with 
'table_cell' for consistency would be a bad idea. Most of the code in a 
typical data table is markup, it isn't uncommon that the table blows up
to 
ten times or more the original size (that maybe used a tab separated 
format), and this is using as minimal element names as 'tr', 'td' and
'th'. 

The case for 'l'/'line' is less strong than 'td'/'table_cell', but it is

quite equivalent to the case for 'tr', a line of table. 

__ 
Jonny Axelsson, 
Web Standards, 
Opera Software 


--- 
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. 
Checked by AVG anti-virus system ( HYPERLINK "http://www.grisoft.com"
\nhttp://www.grisoft.com). 
Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 
  


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002
 

**************************************************************************************************
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
It is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or  the 
sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any one or make copies.

**************************************************************************************************
Received on Friday, 27 December 2002 13:38:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:53 GMT