Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft.

From: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-html-0005@earth.li> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 17:42:38 +0000 (UTC) To: <www-html@w3.org> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208241727550.895-100000@213-152-52-166.dsl.eclipse.net.uk> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:17 GMT

At 2002-08-24T16:49+0100, Toby Inkster wrote:-

> I suggest the level attribute mainly as a means of transition. <h1> to
> <h6> could then be deprecated in XHTML 2.0, and in the next version of
> XHTML, <h1> to <h6> could be dropped, with the level attribute being
> deprecated.

At least one of the two will have to stay, if we want to retain the
ability to split large documents below the top level (as in, for example,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/toc.html>). Unless you use redundant
enclosing section elements, I suppose.

Tim Bagot