W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2002

Re: How about a <notice> element?

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 01:12:19 +0300 (EEST)
To: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>
cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0208210109580.3407-100000@kruuna.Helsinki.FI>

On 2002-06-20, Jonas Jørgensen uttered to www-html@w3.org:

>'type' -- takes one of three values:
>    'notice' (the default): An informational notice.
>    'warning': A warning.
>    'error': An error message.

I would add a "tip", plus segregate the "notice" into two parts, and
endnote and a footnote. Or, better yet, inline-note and out-of-line-note.
That's simply to facilitate paper-online interoperability. The default
rendering would differ greatly between paper and online, of course.
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111
student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:12:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:00 UTC