> Actually this is under (re)consideration. It was a URI in HTML 4 and > XHTML 1.0, but was changed to IDREF in Modularaization of XHTML (and > hence in XHTML 1.1) as > implementation experience has showed that > support for external map reference is very weak This should not be relevant for a spec that is not intended to be backwards compatible. For image maps that are used on multiple pages, a URI reference is the most logical way to accomplish this. Why force authors to use server-side includes when setting this type as a URI would work? > and has a lot of difficulties in implementing it. Such as what? I could forsee some overhead in loading subsequent pages if the map were not cached, but that strikes me as easily solved.Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 19:18:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:28 GMT