W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > October 2001

Re: frames and width definitions

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:43:55 +0200
To: "Iztok Jeras" <jeras@d-d.si>
Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <kuilst0f9018sgjrteh1shgd0p4ndhot2r@4ax.com>
* Iztok Jeras wrote:
>I use frames because in that case I can have an SVG animated menu always
>loaded and visible (without flickers while loading a new page).
>But I have problems with scrolling of the content. Scrolling should be
>enabled for the whole frameset an not only for the single framesets.
>So that two separated strollers for a menu and a desktop frame would not
>be needed, getting a more no frame look.
>
>The width definition should be reviewed too, I can not define the width
>of a frame or table or a <div>
>(140px, 100%-140px) so that the width of the menu would be fixed and the
>desktop would fill the remains of the page.

Please take a look at the 'width' and 'overflow' properties in CSS Level
2. To learn more about CSS, take a look at http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/
-- 
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 07:44:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:49 GMT