W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2001

RE: XHTML Transitional DTD and <td> tags

From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:31:42 +0100
Message-ID: <81E4A2BC03CED111845100104B62AFB50102A7EF@stagecoach.bts.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org
> From:	William F. Hammond [SMTP:hammond@csc.albany.edu]
> It's %Length in the Dec 1999 DTD for HTML 4.01, where the same
> attributes are also deprecated.  That came out just before the XHTML
	OK I take back part of what I said, although I think
	the reasons are still good.  It was changed from
	%Pixels to %Length between the 19980824 PR and the
	the final REC.  It is %Pixels in 4.0 and 3.2.

	My own guess is that it was done to bring it in line
	with de facto authoring practice.

> But -- except possibly for tiny border widths with current widely
> distributed hardware -- rigid lengths make no sense in a scalable
> presentation format.
	[DJW:]  HTML, of course, is not a presentation format.
	Which is why CSS was devised.

--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 14:32:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:57 UTC