From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com> Subject: Re: icons for pages/sites/etc. (was Re: src attribute of IFRAME and FRAME) Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2001, 2:53 PM >> On another note, since an "icon" for a page is purely presentational, this >> really should be done with CSS instead (discussion redirected to www-style). > > An icon is purely presentation only insofar as any media object is > purely presentational. Not true. More like, an icon is purely presentation insofar as a background-image in a document is purely presentation. Both are external media resources not necessary for and thus separate from the core "content/semantics" of the document. > Defined as such, the icon doesn't even need to be visual--one could > conceivably have an audio "icon", which would use sound waves/time > instead of colors/position. Though I don't know what you'd use it for. Defined with CSS the icon doesn't even need to be visual. A URI for an 'icon' property could point to a audio file. "Audio icons" are in use all over the place, though they are usually called "audio cues" instead. TantekReceived on Thursday, 6 December 2001 18:07:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:50 GMT