W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2001

RE: Symbolic name for every character.

From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:11:32 +0100
Message-ID: <81E4A2BC03CED111845100104B62AFB50102A8BB@stagecoach.bts.co.uk>
To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
	From:	cyril2@newmail.ru [SMTP:cyril2@newmail.ru]
	 
	 << File: SymbName.html >>  << File: MultLang.png >>  << File:
MultLang.gif >> 

	[DJW:]  Please post plain text.  Amongst other things 
	attachments require specific hygiene measures.
It is seems that my thoughts flow this way. If HTML-language is based on
US-ASCII-text then it is quite HTML-ly to make ability to express everything
in HTML with US-ASCII-characters.

	[DJW:]  HTML is based on Unicode, with ISO 8859/1 as the
	default HTTP transfer encoding; it is not based on ASCII.
	Any Unicode character can already be respresented by either
	using a UTFx transfer encoding## or using numeric entities; 
	software that deals with international characters should 
	always reduce HTML to Unicode before processing it (including
	treating &pound; as equivalent to &#x00a3; or even &#163;
	or simply .++
[DJW:]  
In addition, I find it convenient when a World Wide Web character could have
an optional language attribute.
For example like this:

<html lang="fr">  It was introduced more than three years ago
and is widely ignored even though one is advised to always use
it on the html element (it is this sort of ignoring of features
that makes your <dynamic> proposal unworkable).

++ Note that it is common to misconfigure browsers in Russia
China, etc. to assume that the HTTP transfer coding is the
local preferred coding and then server pages with no coding
specified.

## Or a specific regional character coding that covers the 
required characters.
-- 
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

	 
	 
Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 07:12:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:49 GMT