Re: [XHTML-L] Modularization of XHTML - RECOMMENDATION

In a message dated 10/04/01 18:47:01 GMT Daylight Time, derhoermi@gmx.net 
writes:


> * AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote on XHTML-L@egroups.com:
> >Some mid-week reading this time. :)
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/
> 
> Hm, i really wonder what appendix A, B and C want to say with 'This
> appendix will contain ...'? Will there be a second edition of the
> specification in the near future or what is the rationale behind this?
> Why was the specification put to recommendation status instead of
> waiting for XML Schema?

An interesting observation!

Wasn't it this same specification which was rushed out on 3rd October 2000 
only to be recalled?

It is a bit disappointing that there are blank "normative" appendices.

How is one to interpret a normative blank appendix? It adds a new dimension 
to modularization perhaps? Or is that muddleurization? Who can say?

Andrew Watt