W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2000

Re: Valid positioning of script elements

From: <news-misc@ada.dhs.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:08:08 -0400
To: JOrendorff@ixl.com
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20000608230808.A616@ada.dhs.org>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 09:00:00PM +0000, JOrendorff@ixl.com wrote:
> Clover Andrew wrote:
> > I note [...] that one may only insert <script>s at block-level,
> > inline, or in <head>. It is invalid for a script to live in
> > [...] <table>, <tr>, <dl> and so on.
> 
[...]
> I hope that <script> <ins> and <del> will eventually fall out
> of HTML and be replaced by some sort of more independent
> XML-based standard.
> 
> For your purposes today, it's probably best to write server-side
> code to generate the HTML document.

So much for graceful degradation. How can one do server-side
scripting for something that the server doesn't know about?
(Whether Javascript is available *and* enabled on the client)

As simple as some markup that will use Javascript to open a
window of a specified size if Javascript can be used, but
link to a specified target window otherwise: looks like it
can be done, only to be rejected by W3C's validator as invalid
HTML. I guess I have to put the whole block-element element
inside <noscript>, and generate an almost-identical copy of
the whole thing (some 100 lines) in the Javascript, only
because <noscript> cannot be put inside a <td>---even though
a <script> can be inside a <td>.

Why is a <noscript> not allowed where a <script> is?

I suppose that would be quite some work as an enhancement for
my meta-HTML-to-plain-HTML filter program. Perhaps I have to
rewrite the damned thing so that it knows what the outermost
enclosing block-level element is.
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 23:08:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT