W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2000

Re: The <HR> tag

From: Daniel Hiester <alatus@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:19:41 -0800
Message-ID: <002601c06f92$5472ec60$9226b3d1@sol>
To: "Christian Smith" <csmith@barebones.com>, "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
Christian said:
"The idea of using images or tables to replicate the behaviour of the
<hr> tag is pretty viral in itself so I'd have to say that your
anti-virus software can't handle the most common type of virus
encountered on the internet (the memetic virus)."

Well, technically, <hr> is a pretty presentational, legacy-type element.
Based on that premise, one could formulate an argument that using an image
would be more structure-oriented than using an <hr>.

Just my two cents.

Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 26 December 2000 18:15:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:44 GMT