Re: Scales Not (was Re: Modularization of XHTML B.3.4.2)

Dave J Woolley wrote:
> 
> > A question for the historians: what was HTML's intent?
> >
>         [DJW:]  Amongst other things, to be simple and not to be another
>         page description language (Postscript, PDF, etc.)
>         or word processing file format (MS Word, Word Perfect,
>         etc.).
> 
[...]

>         Unfortunately, I don't have the HTML 1 spec in the
>         office for the exact words.

Sure you do; you found it:

http://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/MarkUp.html

>         (One interesting quote from Dave Raggett in 1992
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/HTMLConst
> raints.html> is
> It is required that HTML be a common language between all platforms. This
> implies no device-specific markup, or anything which requires control over
> fonts or colors, for example. This is in keeping with the SGML ideal.)

TimBL wrote that, not DSR.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
pager (put return tel# in From or Subject field)
mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 14:50:04 UTC