W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2000

RE: Scales Not (was Re: Modularization of XHTML B.3.4.2)

From: RCI <robert_ingham_uk@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:10:27 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <20000411091027.17615.qmail@web4301.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>, www-html@w3.org
No, I think you're going to have to keep banging _their_ heads against the
wall until it becomes a better cyber-space for the rest of us to live in 
;-)

After all, this is technology, _not_ theology...

--- Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> wrote:
> At 08:39p -0700 04/10/00, Daniel Koger didst inscribe upon an 
> electronic papyrus:
> >Sounds very reminiscent of the 80 column green screen debate around
> >Apple ][ e.  Just as fruitful too.
> 
> Who's debating? I was agreeing with Jan and making a statement, that's
> all.
> I have no intention of starting any kind of debate. Either people 
> understand what HTML is all about, or they don't. It would indeed be 
> pointless for people who understand to engage people who do not 
> understand. It's like that neat saying: "For those who don't believe, 
> there's no explanation possible; and for those who do believe, 
> there's no explanation necessary."
> 
> Sometimes I feel more protective of HTML's intent than its own inventor.
> And that is the most shocking thing of all.
> 
> 
> -Walter
> 
> 
> 

=====
Computer Classics (one of a series)
Keyboard Error: press F1 to continue

____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 05:12:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT