- From: RCI <robert_ingham_uk@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:10:27 +0100 (BST)
- To: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>, www-html@w3.org
No, I think you're going to have to keep banging _their_ heads against the wall until it becomes a better cyber-space for the rest of us to live in ;-) After all, this is technology, _not_ theology... --- Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> wrote: > At 08:39p -0700 04/10/00, Daniel Koger didst inscribe upon an > electronic papyrus: > >Sounds very reminiscent of the 80 column green screen debate around > >Apple ][ e. Just as fruitful too. > > Who's debating? I was agreeing with Jan and making a statement, that's > all. > I have no intention of starting any kind of debate. Either people > understand what HTML is all about, or they don't. It would indeed be > pointless for people who understand to engage people who do not > understand. It's like that neat saying: "For those who don't believe, > there's no explanation possible; and for those who do believe, > there's no explanation necessary." > > Sometimes I feel more protective of HTML's intent than its own inventor. > And that is the most shocking thing of all. > > > -Walter > > > ===== Computer Classics (one of a series) Keyboard Error: press F1 to continue ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 05:12:34 UTC