Alan Isaac wrote: > This discussion seems to take the > equivalence of EM EM and STRONG > to be obvious, but is there anything in > the spec to suggest this? > > Specifically, is there anything to suggest > that EM EM does not suggest emphasis > relative to the encompassing EM rather > than relative to the encompassing block? Hmm. Well, no. The spec says: > EM: Indicates emphasis. > STRONG: Indicates stronger emphasis. That's it. All the same, I feel "emphasis relative to the context" is the commonsense interpretation. -- Jason Orendorff http://www.alarmist.org/Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2000 11:42:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT