At 19:24 01.04.00 -0500, "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu> wrote: >In XHTML 1.1 modularization, B, I, and TT are placed in the "Presentation" >Module. But U, S, and FONT are in the "Legacy" Module. Why is Bold >"presentational", but Underline "legacy"? > >In fact, if you look at the Legacy module, it's *all* presentational markup. >Why not combine the two modules? > > >/Jelks U, S and FONT are deprecated, and rightly so IMHO. BI(TT) are in a different category. My thought about this here: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Feb/0250.html> I'm as for semantic elements as the next guy, but a pre-requisite is that there is some agreed semantic value to them (that's why I'm for killing off STRONG, it doesn't make sense). JonnyReceived on Monday, 3 April 2000 06:58:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT