W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > October 1999

Re: The Future of HTML (was: Acronyms and Abbreviations)

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil.kjernsmo@astro.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 22:43:59 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@operasoftware.com>
cc: JOrendorff@ixl.com, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9910242232400.11801-100000@mirfak>
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:

>Perhaps someone should start collecting a list of "standard" class

While I don't know if introducing new elements for e.g. names are a good
idea, I'm a bit skeptical about "standard" class names. Wouldn't we just
end up with the same kind of mess that we have with meta-names and content
of LINK rel and rev? I mean, "description" and "keywords" are pretty
standard meta names, and of course <LINK rel=next ...>, you've got Dublin
Core and so on, and a pretty nice list of things in use are at 
<URL:http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/> but we needed RDF to clear up in
these issues... If you really need something that must be standard, then
you need a formal specification that is clear, it seems to me.


Kjetil Kjernsmo
Graduate astronomy-student                    Problems worthy of attack
University of Oslo, Norway            Prove their worth by hitting back
E-mail: kjetikj@astro.uio.no                                - Piet Hein
Homepage <URL:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/>
Received on Sunday, 24 October 1999 16:44:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:51 UTC