- From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 02:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > At 20:02 28.09.99 -0400, Arjun Ray wrote: > > >I now see this as the first move to "retire" HTML; it's a move I would > >agree with. > In this case, it should be read as the IETF declaring HTML "someone else's > business". That's what I meant by "retire", and why I quoted the word (to suggest only the IETF's possible take on the issue) :) > I think the W3C is perfectly capable of hosting the debate about whether > it should be "retired" or not. Let's not even go there...:) > [...] the discussion on getting the IETF out of the business of > hosting the definition.) A very good move indeed. Thanks again. Arjun
Received on Friday, 1 October 1999 02:15:59 UTC