On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> ...there are a VERY large number of documents that include more >>> than one STYLE element. >> Yes, but how many of them have TITLE attributes? That's the only >> question relevant to analyzing Ian's proposal. I would guess almost >> none, since currently the TITLE attribute doesn't "do" anything. > What a waste. You have a variety of choices for how to implement > this functionality in a way that does not break backward > compatibility - in fact, I gave you a way to do so that I chose two > years ago explicitly so that it would not cause this problem - [...] Hang on -- the suggestion you gave does _not_ have this functionality. I am suggesting emulating the behaviour of the _title_ attribute. I am NOT looking for a way to hook things into scripting -- I am looking for a way to introduce multiple alternate, named stylesheets. For example, my proposal allows you to supplement different alternate stylesheets with embedded stylesheet styles: <!-- first, link in to four different alternate stylesheets: --> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="style1.css" title="a"> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="style2.css" title="b"> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="style3.css" title="c"> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="style4.css" title="d"> <!-- next, add special style relevant only to this page for each of the alternate stylesheets --> <style type="text/css" title="a"> ... </style> <style type="text/css" title="b"> ... </style> <style type="text/css" title="c"> ... </style> <style type="text/css" title="d"> ... </style> <!-- next, add an alternative style specific to this page --> <style type="text/css" title="e"> ... </style> How does your proposal even come _close_ to supporting this? -- Ian Hickson "So far, people have shown a reasonable amount of sense in evaluating souls (whether they are properly priced)." -- Nick Gibbins; Author of http://totl.net/Soul/, 1999-10-05Received on Thursday, 4 November 1999 18:27:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:40 GMT