W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 1999

Re: Images (width & height)

From: Daniel Cassar <illusion@gulf.net.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:38:52 +0930
Message-ID: <007501bec919$1e9502c0$2fc926cb@Illusion>
To: "w3c html" <www-html@w3.org>
I agree with you totally there!!!
It is really annoying when you start reading a document and it starts
bouncing around the screen because people haven't set width and hight
attributes... but I guess I didn't explain myself properly...

What about tiny bullets around the same size as your font...  because the
files are so small and the image is so small it doesn't (noticably) affect
the text.

Should you still put in image width/height then as it makes my page take a
lot longer to load???

----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Fredette <prowebsites@prowebsites.net>
To: w3c html <www-html@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Images (width & height)


>     AaaK one of my pet peeves! Trying to read a page, and it starts
jumping
> around due to the graphics having no height and width tags. Fastest way in
> the world to turn many people away from your site.
>
> Warmest Regards,
> Steven Fredette
> President ProWebSites.net  ~ For Your Internet Needs and Wants (TM) ~
> Indianapolis, Indiana. USA
> http://www.prowebsites.net
> Site includes: FrontPage help, and links to other FrontPage help sites.
> For the rest of this sig. file - http://www.prowebsites.net/sig.htm
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel Cassar <illusion@gulf.net.au>
> To: w3c html <www-html@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 1999 8:12 AM
> Subject: Images (width & height)
>
>
> > I have a homepage with lots of bullets... These pictures are only small
> but
> > in a effort to speed up that page I decided to go through and include a
> > width and height to all of these bullets... Unfortunately this ended up
> > makeing my page take 2-3 more seconds to load...
> >
> > While it is 'good' programing structure to have width and height on your
> > images I would advise people that they 'probably' don't need to bother
> > including this on small images.
> >
>
Received on Thursday, 8 July 1999 04:01:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:39 GMT