W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 1999

RE: Mailto

From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:13:53 -0500
To: "Ann Navarro" <ann@webgeek.com>, "Bill Rhodes" <wrhodes@qualcomm.com>, "Andreas Thorstensson" <andy@spray.se>, "'Francesca Galera Molina'" <ccbq8@blues.uab.es>, <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000701be44a0$a302d300$01000080@bonezero>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf
> Of Ann Navarro
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 1999 9:44 AM
> To: Bill Rhodes; Andreas Thorstensson; 'Francesca Galera Molina';
> www-html@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Mailto
>
>
> Note, however, that presence in an RFC does not equate to "valid HTML"

This is a URI syntax issue. HTML validity is entirely orthogonal.

> nor
> to proper handling by common browser/email client combinations.

True. But "common browser/email client combinations" will probably handle
these extensions just fine. It's the older, less-common software that might
have difficulty.

Braden
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 1999 13:16:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:38 GMT