Re: Frames spec & the NOFRAMES tag -Reply

Stephanos Piperoglou (sp249@cam.ac.uk)
Sat, 7 Mar 1998 14:10:40 +0000 (GMT)


Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 14:10:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: Stephanos Piperoglou <sp249@cam.ac.uk>
To: Charles Peyton Taylor <ctaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
cc: www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <s4ffca11.025@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980307135937.697A-100000@teatime.joh.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Frames spec & the NOFRAMES tag -Reply

On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Charles Peyton Taylor wrote:

> I found this dissapointing; in my opinion, the browser 
> belongs to the user, not to the web designer.  It's also 
> weird because in all the browsers you can override colors 
> and FONTS, but not frames.

You're quite right. However, we are in the unfortunate situation that the
browser belongs neither to the user nor the designer; it belongs solely to
the browser manufacturer. The former two just disagree over who is more
frustrated by this.

Sorry, I couldn't help myself :-)

ObTech: Have you noticed, over at www.mozilla.org, how they're preparing
everyone, warning them and making sure they're not shocked on March 31st by
how badly written the Netscape source code is going to be?

-- Stephanos Piperoglou -- sp249@cam.ac.uk -------------------
All I want is a little love and a lot of money. In that order.
------------------------- http://www.thor.cam.ac.uk/~sp249/ --