Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:19:25 +1300 (NZDT) From: Sam Vilain <email@example.com> To: Alex Fabrikant <firstname.lastname@example.org> cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227131054.14418Aemail@example.com> Subject: Re: Absolute BASE On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Alex Fabrikant wrote: > >Any paticular reason for requiring the HREF attribute in the BASE element > >to be an absolute URI? Why not resolve a relative URI according to the > >document's URI? > That would be contrary to the purpose of BASE though, wouldn't it? BASE > DEFINES what the relative URIs are based on, and make the href for > *base* relative as well would pretty much defeat the purpose. However, what he's probably trying to do is use a BASE clause to make all his links not dependant on the depth of the current document in the tree - ie so that when he says "images/foo.png" it resolves to "../images/foo.png" (or whatever). Then this means you can move files up and down the tree without changing much, and a whole branch elsewhere without altering all the "base" tags in each file. One similar feature I would like to see added would be the addition of a "ROOT" tag - being a string that prepends any URI starting with '/'. This would aid mirroring etc.