Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 02:25:41 -0500 (EST) From: BDoelling@aol.com Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: No Frames element The <noframes> element should demonstrate functionality different from the <body> element, or else it should be eliminated as redundant. At present, there are three occasions where a <no frames> element would come into play: 1. Browser does not support frames: In this instance, <no frames> should be ignored, behaving like a <body> tag. To my knowledge, this is the current implementation in most browsers. 2. Browser supports frames, but frames are suppressed: Once more, <no frames> should function like a <body> tag. Once more, this is the common implementation. 3. Browser supports frames, frames are not suppressed: In this instance, <no frames> should not function as a <body> tag. Browser should suppress block information between the opening and closing <no frames> tags. Navigational information that is necessary for frame-suppressed (or frame-unable) browsing of the page may be included in the <no frames> block. This is the sort of information that is often redundant in a frame-allowed page, as it is typically provided inside another frame. A frame-allowed browser should therefore suppress this infomration. This allows a single document to work in both a frame-allowed and a frame-unallowed environment, rather than requiring two complete sets of pages for a site.