Re: LINK TYPE=override/type

At 10:23 98/01/22 -0600, Neil St.Laurent wrote:
> > I think that in this case the browser can rely on the somewhat more
> > purposeful intentions of the web author rather than the mechanations of a
> > server..
> 
> Only as a thought (not really part of this discussion), it would be 
> nice to see the future of HTTP allow the client to send a 
> Content-Type request:
> 
> GET index HTTP/1.2
> Content-Type: text/html

I hope I won't repeat somebody else, but just for your reference,
the above is possible in HTTP 1.1, and was already in HTTP 1.0.
Just that the request header is called "Accept:" instead of "Content-Type:".
Also, the "charset" part of the content type is factured out into
Accept-Charset:, and there are a few more "Accept"s, in particular
Accept-Language:.

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 1998 00:57:07 UTC