block (%blocklevel;) as opposed to block (%blocklevel; | %inline

Neil St.Laurent (neil@bigpic.com)
Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:32:51 -0600


Message-Id: <199710211825.MAA01388@underworld.bigpic.com>
From: "Neil St.Laurent" <neil@bigpic.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:32:51 -0600
Subject: block (%blocklevel;) as opposed to block (%blocklevel; | %inline

I suppose this has probably been discussed and been rationalized 
fully, but I think there should be a big bold note in the HTML 4.0 
site at W3 stating the change:

block  ( %blocklevel; )

TO

block ( %blocklevel; | %inline; )

Noting that simple constructs like

<UL>
   <LI>Hello
   <LI>There
</UL>

are now invalid and should be:

<UL>
   <LI><P>Hello
   <LI><P>There
</UL>


__
| Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://bigpic.com/mortar/>
| Neil St.Laurent  neil@bigpic.com
| Big Picture Multimedia