Re: Directory Trees

Rob (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Sat, 11 Oct 1997 20:59:09 -0500


Message-Id: <199710120102.VAA17378@unix.asb.com>
From: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: Tim Bagot <timothy.bagot@keble.oxford.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 20:59:09 -0500
CC: www-html@w3.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95.971011142216.32101C-100000@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Directory Trees

On 11 Oct 97, Tim Bagot <timothy.bagot@keble.oxford.ac.uk> wrote:

> I think it would be useful to have another list-like element which could
> be nested to produce collapsible trees. This would also be useful for long
> lists of contents, permitting painless navigation of several levels of
> subheadings.

At this point in HTML's history and use, it would be better to have it as 
a style-sheet attribute.

Or better yet, browsers which give a compressed table-of-contents view of 
a page showing all headings, lists, and anchors.

Rob

-----
"The word to 'kill' ain't dirty    | Robert Rothenburg wlkngowl@unix.asb.com
 I used it in the last line        | http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl
 but use the short word for lovin' | http://www.wusb.org/mutant
 and Dad you wind up doin' time."  | PGP'd mail welcome (ID 0x5D3F2E99)