Re: why TITLE, not TITLE? (fwd)

Liam Quinn (liam@htmlhelp.com)
Tue, 13 May 1997 00:20:48 -0500


Message-Id: <199705130419.AAA22261@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>
From: "Liam Quinn" <liam@htmlhelp.com>
To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 00:20:48 -0500
Subject: Re: why TITLE, not TITLE? (fwd)
CC: www-html@w3.org
In-reply-to: <199705130246.TAA17467@server.livingston.com>

On 12 May 97 at 19:46, MegaZone wrote:

> So I end up making my own DTD modifications when I need to.  Which to date
> is just some tweaks to 3.2 - but if the W3C doesn't put out some kind of
> 3.2+CSS DTD I may have to do that myself too.

Have you not seen the DTD at
<http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/NOTE-html-970421.html>?  WebTechs 
and KGV both support it.

KGV has also added support for the recent Cougar draft, which makes 
it easier to use Cougar for CSS pages.

Liam Quinn
===============  http://www.htmlhelp.com/%7Eliam/  ===============
Web Design Group            Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development
http://www.htmlhelp.com/    http://enhanced-designs.com/