[Spam?] Re: Comments on HTML 4 draft (9/Nov/1997)

Walter Ian Kaye (walter@natural-innovations.com)
Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:51:24 -0500 (EST)

Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:51:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <v03010d04b0bcb467c9de@[]>
In-Reply-To: <199712150148.UAA14945@smaug.java.utoronto.ca>
To: www-html@w3.org
From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
Subject: [Spam?] Re: Comments on HTML 4 draft (9/Nov/1997)

At 8:48p -0500 12/14/97, Ian Graham wrote:
>4.  Section 17.2 -- FORM Element GET Method
>    The FORM METHOD="Get" is noted as deprecated. This seems
>    overly harsh, since GET method form queries are the only such
>    query that is bookmarkable. If this is to be deprecated, is
>    there then an alternative mechanism?

  * get:Deprecated.Use the HTTP GET method. This method appends name/value
    pairs to the URL specified by action and sends this new URL to the
    server. This is the default value for backwards compatibility. This
    method has been deprecated for reasons of internationalization.

I don't understand what internationalization has to do with it,
so long as the form generates RFC-1738-compliant data...

Can someone provide some answers?  Is i18n incompatible with rfc1738 ?!?

  Walter Ian Kaye <boo@SLAC.Stanford.EDU>        Menlo Park, CA