- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 14:46:14 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <199704130734.DAA13692@fnx.com>, abigail@fnx.com (Abigail) wrote: > I think 2.3 would have been a much better number. Certainly. But the marketing guys wouldn't have accepted that. "We already do advanced HTML 3.0 things (like frames!), so why would we advertise that we support oldfashioned stuff?" > BTW, you can still use <person>, <abbrev>, <acronym>. It degrades > gracefully on non-HTML 3.0 browsers. But doesn't validate. :-( -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>
Received on Sunday, 13 April 1997 08:52:41 UTC