Re: Proposal to unify Fill-in, (fwd)

Once upon a time Foteos Macrides shaped the electrons to say...
>	Bearing in mind that the INSERT draft is in the process of
>being revised, it already enables insertion of static or dynamic
>HTML fragments, with no need to modify servers if that's what's
>providing the fragments, and only minor mods needed for the client
>software.  You can insert static fragments via:
>
><INSERT
>   type="text/chtml"
>   data="http:/host[:port/path/foo.chtml">
>Altenative markup, or zilch, for INSERT-blind clients.
></INSERT>
>
>where .chtml has been mapped to text/chtml in your server's configuration
>file.

this is exactly what I have been looking for and proposed - if this is true
I'm very happy. :-)

>=========================================================================
> Foteos Macrides            Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
> MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU         222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
>=========================================================================

Hey, my old stomping groups - I went to WPI and lived in Worcester for a
few years after I got out.

-MZ
--
Although I work for Livingston Enterprises Technical Support, I alone am
responsible for everything contained herein.  So don't waste my managers'
time bitching to them if you don't like something I've said.  Flame me.
Phone: 800-458-9966  support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
FAX: 510-426-8951    6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566

Received on Friday, 22 March 1996 03:44:35 UTC