Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD

Solko, Dave (
Wed, 26 Jun 1996 22:33:10 -0400

Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=University_of_Ci%l=EXCHANGE-960627023310Z-500@EXCHANGE.UC.EDU>
From: "Solko, Dave (SOLKODE)" <>
To: "''" <>,
Subject: RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 22:33:10 -0400

>Sent: 	Wednesday, June 26, 1996 7:58PM
>According to Netscape, frames are supposed to *replace* the normal
>body, so they should either be IN the head, or follow directly
>after it.

According to NS's own page on frames:
recommend putting the <frameset> in the head. 

"within the FRAMESET you can only have other nested       FRAMESET tags,
FRAME tags, or the NOFRAMES tag."
"A Frame-capable Internet client ignores all tags and data       between
start and end NOFRAMES tags."
I inferred that they intended the FRAMESET to replace the BODY. And
since BODY-contained elements can appear within the NOFRAMES element --
for non-frame browsers, this too implies that the FRAMESET should exist
outside the HEAD.

---------D a v e  S o l k o-----------513.556.5264-----ooo0-(.
.)-0ooo-----	     (_)| Designer   Frontier Archive     |
Consultant	 	| Webmaster 
---  The stranger side of the