Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)

Martijn Koster (mak@surfski.webcrawler.com)
Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:14:56 -0700


Message-Id: <9606121614.AA09200@webcrawler.com>
To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments in HTML (fwd) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jun 1996 11:53:52 PDT."
             <199606111853.LAA09597@server.livingston.com> 
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:14:56 -0700
From: Martijn Koster <mak@surfski.webcrawler.com>

In message <199606111853.LAA09597@server.livingston.com>, MegaZone writes:

> Once upon a time S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk shaped the electrons to say...
> > [...] browser authors accepted any > to terminate a comment
> 
> IMHO - bullshit.  There is no reason you have to support it.

Ehr... installed base? :-)
 
> NS 2.0 and up does not.

Actually, it appears the latest and greatest from Netscape supports both :-)

For example, try:

   <! this is not a > comment

   <!-- that was not a > commentary --->

in Navigator 3.0b4-96135 this prints:

   comment

which happens to be what you want.

If you do a view source the proper comment is in italics,
and the first line isn't.

> It is *wrong* and WILL BREAK valid comments.  Any browser that supports it
> is miserably broken and I will recommend to anyone using it that they
> drop it.

Doesn't break if you do the above. Remember "be liberal in what you accept"...
Easy enough lexer change... (he says just having done it in WebCrawler :-)

-- Martijn (wishing everyone collaborated on HTML parsing...)
__________
Email: m.koster@webcrawler.com
WWW: http://info.webcrawler.com/mak/mak.html