Re: Cougar DTD: Do not use CDATA declared content for SCRIPT (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Mon, 29 Jul 1996 20:45:13 -0700 (PDT)


Message-Id: <199607300345.UAA01833@server.livingston.com>
Subject: Re: Cougar DTD: Do not use CDATA declared content for SCRIPT (fwd)
To: www-html@w3.org
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 20:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>

Once upon a time David Perrell shaped the electrons to say...
>The formalism itself should not be a hack. If a script cannot currently
>be legal SGML content, then either a content type should be devised
>that works or SCRIPT should not be formalized in its current form at
>all.

I was pondering this over the weekend, but I'm handicapped in that I came
from HTML and have been learning SGML only as time permits (ha!) so I don't
have the skill needed...

We've been arguing about how CDATA or PCDATA both have problems.  Well, can
we define a new type - say SDATA (Script DATA) such that it handles inline
scripting and can be handled as another data type in SGML without hacking
up existing scripts?

Another question - <SCRIPT SRC="data:..."></SCRIPT>

Can someone give me the URL to investigate data: URLs, I'd like to see how
multiline scripts would be inlined.  (How do the line returns get 
coded, does it handle actual returns in the file to line wrap cleanly, etc)

-MZ
--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway  #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566