Message-Id: <199607022220.SAA16187@portia.portia.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Mary Morris) Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Subject: Re: Introducing NetscapeML In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Jun 1996 21:09:03 PDT." <199607010409.VAA01257@thyme> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 18:20:28 -0400 From: Matthew James Marnell <firstname.lastname@example.org> :>Don't stress too far on the latest Netscape sin. This isn't a closed :>market. Netscape's lead is a precarious thing that can be ripped away :>by bad karma in just a few web generations. They will have their due. :>Just as Microsoft will for their long delays in Unix compatibility and :>moderate delays in Mac compatibility. The wheel turns. When you say that last sentence do you mean that MS may eventually have a Unix version of their browser on the market? On Unix, I have a much larger choice of browsers than on the Mac. In fact the only major browser that I don't have access to on Unix is MSIE. MSIE may even be a welcome product for Unix platforms, if/when it ever comes out. In fact, I'd get rid of Netscape altogether (finally). Matt PS, the more versions of Unix supported the better.