Re: Inline code a mistake?

Walter Ian Kaye (boo@best.com)
Fri, 26 Apr 1996 15:58:49 -0700


Message-Id: <v02140b09ada704ca4cae@[205.149.180.135]>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 15:58:49 -0700
To: www-html@w3.org
From: boo@best.com (Walter Ian Kaye)
Subject: Re: Inline code a mistake?

At 3:33p 04/26/96, David Ornstein wrote:
>At 02:54 PM 4/26/96 -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
>>At 1:34p 04/26/96, David Ornstein wrote:
>>>FWIW, on a practical level, I don't think people who are developing
>>>serious sites are doing much development with tools other than souped-up
>>>editors, though.  This means that for a while (at least until we understand
>>>what WYSIWYG really *means* in the context of Web authoring) many people
>>>will still want the convenience of putting scripts right into their *file*...
>>
>>
>>Um, are we talking about code designed to display as code (syntax coloring)
>or encoded data designed to be
>> processed separately (.hqx and .zip files), or code meant to be *run* upon
>receipt? Clarification needed...
>
>I didn't start the thread.  But *my* goal is related to neither of the
>above.  I'm working on server-side tools...


I mentioned three cases actually. But even with server-side tools, the end
product winds up on a client...

__________________________________________________________________________
    Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>     Programmer - Excel, AppleScript,
          Mountain View, CA                         ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML
 http://www.natural-innovations.com/     Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter