Message-Id: <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 18:46:52 -0500 To: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org> From: email@example.com (Murray Altheim) Subject: Re: Inline macros Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: >At 01:40 PM 4/25/96 -0700, David Ornstein wrote: >>Is there some literal introduction character we could use (back tick or >>something) that would allow the lexer to simply gobble this stuff up into >>one big binary chunk? This would allow something like: >> >><mimesection type=txt/x-funk> >>`%my(funcky, macro); >>more stuff in the funk language` >></mimesection> > >You are both trying to reinvent SGML marked CDATA sections. There is no need >to reinvent it. It does exactly what you are suggesting. Most SGMLers >consider it a Bad Idea to mix SGML and non-SGML data in the same file, but >if you want to do it, SGML already allows it. > > Paul Prescod And it's not syntactically ugly or complicated, won't make your palms hairy or anything. Given that HTML is *an application of SGML* it is already part of HTML. Because this feature is simply not available in *most* browsers doesn't make it invalid HTML. No need to reinvent anything here, folks: Just implement what is already there. ('MSC' is SGML-eze for 'marked section close', which is ']]'.) <![ CDATA [ -- any durned thing in here you want except MSC -- (This file must be converted with BinHex 4.0) :$QeKBh"RF$)f-fNZFfPd!&0*9%46593K!*!$"d3&!*!%IHC6593K!!%!"d3&FNa KG3)!N!3@!6!J)!TYB@0`Ch!b0M0T!*!9H(%!N!2$!-F"I`*E!*!$"J#3$iB!!!& [...] Jbkh-,Td[Yk!YN!#!))e3$p)+Iq9r0V!VQ5BUMqeJb5M[#*`lbHq-S(Y$L[m$!!! K)3TYB@0`Ch!b0M0T!*!D``$(!Am#@`#3!`%!"cS6!*!(&J#3!iB!!!&Jrj!%!3# Y66a3V9CI+`#3"3HIm`#3"3G$$`#3#MHF#mm!!!: ]]> That's it. Not much of a barn burner. And legal, just not widely supported. Oh, just read David O's latest message. MSC is not ']', rather ']]', so I don't think that's so much of an issue. You mention describing a chunk -- well, that can be done several ways. One way it could be done in 'SGML-savvy HTML' (for lack of a better term) which would keep the SGML and non-SGML data distinct by declaring an entity that refers to your non-SGML data: -- sample embedding ---- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//Spyglass//DTD HTML 2.0 Extended//EN" "http://www.stonehand.com/dtd/html2x.dtd" [ <!ENTITY foo SYSTEM "http://www.stonehand.com/murray/foo.sit.hqx" > ]> <HTML> <TITLE>Document Title</TITLE> <BODY> <P>Here's some embedded doodad: <![ CDATA [&foo;]]> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------------------------ The 'SGML Bad Idea' (but still legal) would simply be putting the contents of 'foo.sit.hqx' in the place of '&foo;', which is what the processing system is doing anyway. Declaration subsets (the [part] after the PUBLIC and SYSTEM references in the above DOCTYPE declaration) are a common SGML structure. We just don't see them in this neck of the woods much. Murray ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Murray Altheim, Program Manager Spyglass, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts email: <mailto:email@example.com> http: <http://www.stonehand.com/murray/murray.html> "Give a monkey the tools and he'll eventually build a typewriter."