Message-Id: <199510021148.MAA01634@satie.lami.univ-evry.fr> To: Brian Behlendorf <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: An extension mechanism for HTML In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 01 Oct 1995 13:25:22 MST." <Pine.SGI.email@example.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 1995 12:48:30 +0100 From: Christophe Bonnet <firstname.lastname@example.org> > This is definitely a step in the right direction, but unless I'm > mistaken, that only helps in situations where new functionality is > introduced as container tags - if the new functionality is introduced as > another attribute or a non-container element, then it doesn't help much, > although the non-container tag can certainly have an ALT attribute. My 2 cents : These non-container tags could easily be made into container tags, which contain but the <ALT>...</ALT> construct. And in this case, both the <ALT> and the </ALT> tags could be omitted, couldn't they ? Hope my answer's not too naive... --Christophe.