Re: overloading QUERY_STRING

Alex Stewart (riche@crl.com)
Tue, 16 May 95 18:59:35 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brooke Smith: "Test two"
Previous message: Henry Minsky: "device-independent units (NOT!)"
In reply to: Peter A. Dominguez: "Re: overloading QUERY_STRING"

Message-Id: <9505170159.AA0172@localhost>
Date: Tue, 16 May 95 18:59:35 -0800
From: Alex Stewart <riche@crl.com>
Subject: Re: overloading QUERY_STRING
To: peter@pad.com
Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org
In-Reply-To: <peter-9504170040.AA00039338@pad> from "Peter A. Dominguez" at May 16 95 8:48 pm

> I was told by Netscape that the QUERY_STRING presented would 'break a lot of
> browsers'.

This is not an adequate excuse from anyone.  A design flaw is a design flaw.
(what, these people have never heard of malloc?)

sheesh.

-alex
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Alex Stewart - riche@crl.com - Richelieu @ Diversity University MOO
                         http://www.crl.com/~riche
           "For the world is hollow, and I have touched the sky."

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brooke Smith: "Test two"
Previous message: Henry Minsky: "device-independent units (NOT!)"
In reply to: Peter A. Dominguez: "Re: overloading QUERY_STRING"