Re: Multiple columns/ all th

Core Systems (
26 Jun 1995 17:07:05 U

Message-Id: <>
Date: 26 Jun 1995 17:07:05 U
From: "Core Systems" <>
Subject: Re: Multiple columns/ all th
To: "kitblake" <>,

Mail*Link(r) SMTP               RE>Multiple columns/ all this talk about

>>1280x1024 screen my browser comes up 780 wide by 892 high.
>Wrong assumption: I work on an Indy - 1280x1024. And I still find 800 pixel
>line lengths hard to read.

This whole conversation seems to be predicated on "pixel" as a unit of
measure. Although it is true that current browsers interpret images  as
have a width and height measured in pixels,  measuring anything in pixels
should be considered a temporary hack to be repaired as soon as possible.

Others have already pointed out that FIG will use real-world units.  I
don't think it would break any rules if browsers also interpreted current
html images, rules, etc. as being measured in printers points (which just
happen to by 72 per inch, a nice match to a typical 72dpi screen
resolution) rather than pixels.  If a user wants a different scaling, a
"lens" mapping (applied to both text and images) is appropriate.


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by with SMTP;26 Jun 1995 10:12:40 U
Received: from by (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA07816; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:01:17 -0700
Received: from www19 ( by (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA10152; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:01:15 -0700
Received: by www19 (5.0/NSCS-1.0S) 
	id AA22189; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 12:54:53 -0400
Message-Id: <v01510102ac1494d1fcfd@[]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 11:58:23 -0500
To: (kitblake),
From: (Michal Young)
Subject: RE: Multiple columns/ all this talk about pixels
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/941
Precedence: list